Web Hosting Reviews

I needed a new linux web hosting provider so I found this really cool site - [[link removed by admin]]. Check it out, I think they did a great job on comparison of web hosting plans.

We are thinking about purchasing acehelpdesk.com helpdesk system . Anyone here used them ? . Please do let me know

After an "interesting" experience with Apollo hosting, I have moved onto IndexCore(IC) hosting. They are more media friendly company for developers, designer and other walks of life to host multiple sites.

After the bad experience with canaca, now I'm using mediatemple (mt). It used to be a very expensive host, but now they are offering hosting plans for multiple sites at good prices.

Host M is not a wise choice. If I knew then what I knew now I would have "stayed clear". Got them from listserv posting. Have had them for 16 months with intermittent server problems and irregularities, email incompatibilities with Verizon and Thunderbird. But that pales with what happened last week. Server went down Sat Aug. 20 and wasn't restored until Aug 24. Worse is that on Sat. they lost 3 days of prior emails...pretty hard to do on an IMAP server.

Hello Edgard, I was in a worst situation than yours with my previous host canaca.

Updated Hostm Review Aug-2005. Recently me and other hostm.com users have been experiencing random server problems affecting access to email, control panel or sites.

0costdomains.com is an ICANN accredited registrar. They offer a $0 cost domain name with any of their hosting plans.

Unfortunately the deal is not as good as it seems.

Nomonthlyfees.com avoid this web hosting company, they offer free domain name with their hosting plans.

A friend of mine used his own ISP company for hosting. One day he noticed, while in a customer's office, that the firewall had blocked out his site. He had purchased a domain name and had it pointed to his own ISP web space. On making enquiries he found that part of his domain name supplied by his ISP, was recognized by the firewall as blocked content. Although his own domain name was suitable it was the actual host name that was containing the wording that the firewall did not like.